With regard to the Budget Process, the Administrative Court (TA) refers to the poor alignment between the priority actions indicated in the Economic and Social Plans (PES) and in the approved Budgets, under the PQG 2015-2019. The same report emphasizes that this finding was answered by the Government in the context of the contradictory of the RPCGE 2018. The Government said that it was about to be taken care of, since the process of reform of the Subsystem of Planning and Budgeting was underway, by a program that would ensure the alignment of the PES and the State Budget (OE).
The CIP asks the Government when this reform process will be effectively implemented, as it has not been implemented so far (SO 2021). The issue of lack of alignment between budget documents is one of the findings that carry over from year to year, for more than 5 years, and has already been raised in several assessments on budget transparency (eg Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability – PEFA and Open Budget Index – OBI) as a factor that negatively contributes to the transparency and effective monitoring of the Budget
happy to here this
Comments are closed.